p. 2, quotation from Kant, 1st line:         read "On what do truth and falsity in each judgement rest?..."

p. 66, 2nd para:                                      obviously <Heidegger> is not a concept, but a proper name, nonetheless my main point in that paragraph is still valid

p. 149, 2nd line from below:                  read "..., and such judgements are always..."

p. 151, 4 lines from below:                      read "objective validity"

p. 152, 3 lines from above:                     read "objective validity"

p. 156, 2nd para, line 12:                        substitute "relates" for "unites", the line should read: "...'pure synthesis' which relates the manifold of representations 'to the ..."

p. 156, 2nd para, line 16:                        substitute "relates" for "unites", the line should read: "...refers back to the original-synthetic unity of consciousness that relates ..."

p. 163, line 3, end of line:                       read "...and 'my' as the..."                    

p. 180, 8th line from above:                   read "our cognition to which"

p. 183, fn. 4, line 9/10:                             read "objective validity" 

p. 280, 1st para, 2nd line from below:   read "a priori synthesis in a sensible manifold" with "a priori" also italicised

p. 311, 6th line from below:                     read "corresponds to"

p. 313, 15th line from above:                  read "as Kant says"

p. 325, lines 3–6:                                    read "If it were indeed the case that Kant argues in the concluding section of TD that, necessarily, all intuitions or perceptions in the broadest sense stand under the categories and are thus synthetically united, ..."

p. 327, line 6:                                          read "...do not agree with..."

​