My co-author of the 2015 article we published in Philosophical Review on Kant & space has published a follow-up in Kantian Review in which he addresses various critiques of our position. I don't agree with everything, in particular I dispute how he formulates the role of synthesis in the generation of space. I criticise his view of synthesis (esp. figurative synthesis) in a draft paper on synthesis. Particularly important in Onof's piece is that he debunks the idea which some critics entertained that we somehow argued that one can have an intuition of brute space. I may add a few more on space specifically in another piece.
top of page
Dennis Schulting
M.A. Classical Theology,
Ph.D. Philosophy
Independent philosopher and specialist in the study of Kant & German Idealism. Former Assistant Professor of Metaphysics & the History of Philosophy at the University of Amsterdam
DISCLAIMER: THIS SITE AND PHILPAPERS ARE, APART FROM PUBLISHERS' WEBPAGES, THE ONLY OFFICIAL SITES FOR DOWNLOADING MY ARTICLES; I HAVE NOT CREATED AN ACADEMIA OR RESEARCHGATE PAGE, SO PLEASE DO NOT USE THEM IF YOU COME ACROSS SOME SUCH PAGES
bottom of page
Comments